You may want to check your "facts" It does not matter who was in office,if Clinton was still in office, 9/11 is what caused the crash. During Clinton's final year and half the economy was beginning to slow after record highs. Simple economics, what goes up must come down. That combined with 9/11 caused the crash. During Bush's 8 years he only moved the debt 4 trillion while being in a much worse situation than Obama has ever seen. Obama though, is spending 4 trillion a year! Hate to tell you this, Obama lies just as much as any other politician. But, you are right about social issues. Many do not believe in a Marxist society and because of what it leads to. This is why millions of Americans have served, fought, and died for the sole reason to keep America from becoming a communist society.
I agree with you on the support or at least respect the position once election is over. Though I would say democrats started the president bashing. Obama has had it easy compared to what Bush had to endure from Liberal media and the left in general. All that said, I (a navy vet myself) think we need to remove that commander-in-chief title from all presidents now and future. I am sorry, but even Bush's National Guard doesn't pass in my opinion, but someone with no military should NEVER be called the commander-in-chief. The reason Presidents had that title to begin with was because at one time in order to be considered a Presidential candidate even, usually meant you were a General or Admiral in the armed forces or a war hero. Your average American today could care less presidential candidates have served the country are wanting to lead. Politics today are driven entirely on media and party designation A or B. The person running themselves, are irrelevant
Justin Garner is now following…
Staff picks of what's best from across the GOOD community