Discover and share stories

of adventure, connection, and change making.

5 people think this is good

Civil Liberties vs National Security Debate: Where Do You Stand?

Truman Project and Center for National Policy

Leaking 41 slides and a four-page court order has led to one of most hotly contested debates in recent memory. As President Obama pointed out, “you can’t have a 100 percent security, and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience.” So the question remains: How does the U.S. government, the National Security Agency (NSA), and the American public strike the right balance?

Continue to trumanproject.org

Inappropriate?

Discuss

  1. {{attachment.file.name}}
  1. {{fields.video_link.url}}

Ready to post! You’ve uploaded the maximum number of images.

Your video is ready to post!

Oops! Nice pic, but it’s just not our (file) type. Please try uploading a .jpg or .png image.

Well, this is embarrassing. Something went wrong when posting your comment. Care to try again?

That image is too large. Maximum size is 6MB.

Please enter a valid URL from YouTube or Vimeo.

Embedding has been disabled for this video.

{{c.errors.other}}

Posting comment...

  • Mia Pokriefka

    The ongoing debate in my head is that Edward Snowden is either a quiet hero who has performed a vital public service, or he is a traitor who broke the most solemn of oath. two positions at once: Snowden is a whistle-blower and a sneak. If anyone else is feeling the ambivalence, Slate summed it up nicely: "The ambivalents are trapped in a culture that prizes univalents" : http://slate.me/11KGqGh

  • John Wynn

    A timely, thought-provoking, issue...I, for one, will look at both sides carefully and thoughtfully before reaching a decision.